March 12th, 2002


mole book

More on the the uncomfortably hot seat a journalist finds himself in when he losses control of spin.

  • Paul Freund says The New York Times is out to humiliate David Vise, erstwhile Nashvillian and bestselling author, with its Monday story about his book bulk purchases.
  • Vise just wanted to “create community,” he tells Publishers Weekly.
  • Today, the New York Times’ editorial page lets Vise off the hook, yet smirks while doing so.

    Here’s my lame opinion (based completly on wild guesses) of what happened: Vise is a good reporter and an excellent promoter who really, really wanted a best seller. He probably thought his previous book was not well promoted. And so, with The Bureau and the Mole: The Unmasking of Robert Philip Hanssen, he chooses a publisher world famous for his promotional skills. But even then, Vise thinks he personally can out-market the profoundly-bad marketers who sell most books. So, like thousands of misguided souls before him, he has a 1999 flash-back and comes up with a plan to sell books on the Internet. He’s embarassed to tell his publisher what he wants to do, so he orders some copies from bn.com. And from then, well, I think it probably went something like Vise’s explanation.

    In my opinion, I believe Vise is still probably uncomfortable admitting that his only scheme was simply to make as much money as possible and had nothing to do with “creating community.” I think now he’s embarassed that he looks foolish for not buying the books from his publisher (or from wholesaler Ingram Book Co., for that matter, which has a warehouse within an easy drive of where he lives.) I’m willing to believe he is not guilty of trying to manipulate a placement on the NYT Best Sellers list (although the multiple orders of 999 books seem a bit fishy).

    As Vise said to a luncheon I attended Monday, the most calls he’s receiving is from other authors asking him how he did it. That “how to” manual should be his next book.

    (Jim Romenesko’s MediaNews is doing a great job following this story.)





  • Medialife.com’s Jeff Bercovici takes a look at the “new sister” magazine, Real Simple.

    Quote:

    Moreover, in a year when countless magazines took a beating on the newsstand, Real Simple’s single-copy sales were up 24.3 percent, according to the Audit Bureau of Circulations. About a third of the magazine’s circulation comes through the newsstand. That’s impressive when you consider that Real Simple’s covers lack the two things women’s magazine editors rely on most to fuel sales: sex and celebrities. “I have consciously made it a kind of quiet cover,” says managing editor Carrie Tuhy. “Martha and Oprah and Rosie are in their various own ways celebrity driven. We’re sensibility driven.” That serene, understated sensibility doesn’t allow for an eye-catching, oversize logo or cover lines promising better orgasms. It doesn’t even allow for people of any sort, much less celebrities.

    Also, look for Hearst’s new “outsert” Chic Simple and a rash of other Simple Knock-offs and extensions. My suggestions: Real Confusing. Simple Mind. Simple for Dummies. Simple Company. Real Old.





    March 12th, 2002

    Here’s the Readers Digest version of this story: Its biggest shareholder says hold-off on that Reiman Publishing acquistion. How funny is that?