Daily Archives: Thursday, October 2, 2003

But why? Now that I’ve got that Limbaugh rant out of my system, I can get back to blogging about important magazine industry stuff, like do you recall last month when Britney Spears sort of went topless for Rolling Stone … Continue reading →

Overrated (left), Underrated (right)Click each for stats. Fools rush in: I know you’ve been asking yourselves, “I wonder why Rex hasn’t blogged that whole Rush Limbaugh thing?” Well, now that he’s resigned and I had a two-hour flight yesterday during … Continue reading →

The “oral history” story form: Here’s a magazine article and here’s an interview with its writer regarding its “story form.” Interesting insight and another example of the helpful material for writers from the Poynter Institute.

This could never happen: This article makes it sound like there are magazine editors and art directors who use stock photos in magazines and then those same stock photos appear in other places. Soon, readers are wondering, how can this … Continue reading →

Actionable? This blog typically makes comments about the magazine industry stories to which it links. However, this blog will forego that practice with this link. (Note to rexblog visitors who click on the previous link after it dies: sorry.)