October 21st, 2003



May 5, 2003 October 27, 2003


August 4, 2003 January 20, 2003

“You know, there are many fun parts of the job, and the most fun part is figuring out what the cover is every week.”

If that quote sounds familiar, perhaps it’s because it’s from the previous post.

It’s what Time Magazine managing editor Jim Kelly said in an interview with Mediabistro.com.
After posting that comment about how much fun Jim Kelly has figuring
out what the cover of Time is every week, I was heading out of my
office when I was surprised to see in my in-box an old copy of Time
from earlier this year. But then I realized it was the current issue
and was merely evocative of the earlier issue.

That’s when I realized how much fun Jim Kelly and his staff must really
be having each week. First, they have fun trying to guess what
Newsweek’s cover will be and then seeing how close they can come to matching it.
Or, if that’s no fun, they’ll look through all the year’s previous
issues, choose one, and then try to see just how closely they can mimic
it on this week’s cover before anyone notices.

This sounds almost as much fun as the editors at Maxim
who ran random blurbs from other magazines on their November cover to
parody the fact that no one looks at anything on a Maxim cover but the
model.


What fun it must be when
someone yells across the Time offices to Jim, “Hey, I bet we could run
the same cover every week and no one would notice.” And then Jim laughs
and yells back, “Okay, you’re on.”

Sometimes, however, when they’re having fun doing this, it serendipitously results in something seriously remarkable. I guess that’s when it’s really fun.





October 21st, 2003
This is fun?

This is fun? Time Magazine’s managing editor Jim Kelly tells mediabistro’s Jesse Oxfeld, “You know, there are many fun parts of the job, and the most fun part is figuring out what the cover is every week.” Please, don’t anyone show Jim the rexblog feature, “Clone Covers, 2003.” It might remind him that the least fun part of his job was going to newsstand nine Sunday mornings earlier this year and discovering he had figured out the same cover as Newsweek.





October 21st, 2003
Reinstated

Reinstated: My “friend” has been pardoned by a certain search company now that he is in compliance with their advertising program’s terms of service. To be reinstated, he had to remove an offending post from months ago that encouraged visitors to click on ads so that he could earn more money. They’ve let him know that he can now display the ads once more on his weblog. He doesn’t really want to as he has yet to get any payment from the search company as only about 2-3 people a day ever click on one of them. However, he has put the ads back up on his site because he noticed that the search company had quit indexing his site regularly since he removed them. And since that search is the only way he manages to find posts that are more than a day or two old, he has placed the ads back at the bottom of the page. And please, just because I have done the same thing on the bottom on this page, please do not infer that my friend and I have the same blog, although, his is called “rexblog” also.





October 21st, 2003
Freakin’ contract year


freak

Freakin’ contract year: Tennessee Titans defensive end Jevon “The Freak” Kearse has been named the AFC Defensive Player-of-the-Week following his outstanding performance in Sunday’s 37-17 victory at Carolina. Is it any coincidence that after this season, he becomes a free agent? Those of you who visit the rexblog for magazine industry news may wonder what this has to do with anything. But hey, that’s what this whole personal journalism thing is all about.





October 21st, 2003
Healthy

Healthy: Mediapost’s Larry Dobrow says Men’s Health Magazine’s publisher Mary Ann Bekkedahl still wants to “pump….it up.”





October 21st, 2003
Same facts, different sign

Same facts, different sign: The NY Post’s Keith Kelly says fewer people are attending the MPA convention this year (sorry, temporary link) and concludes this is another sign of weakness looming in the industry. However, let’s just play devil’s advocate here for a moment: What if Kelly is wrong and the real reason that the executives aren’t there is that they’re back home selling ads for the first time in three years and don’t have time for a golf junket. Perhaps, go with me here please, perhaps the last three years have taught them that when the phone rings and you have advertisers actually wanting to meet with you, then, heck, why go hang out with other magazine people? Maybe, just maybe, the last three years of the worst advertising recession in their careers has led these executives to conclude that the time to make hay is when the sun is shinning and the time to play golf is when, well, the sun also is shinning but ads aren’t selling. Just a thought.





October 21st, 2003
Are we lucky, or what?

Are we lucky or what: According to Advertising Age, the American Socieity of Managing Editors (ASME) is battling product placement in magazine editorial. I wonder where the managing editors at the Magazine of the Year, Lucky, stand on this issue?

Quote:

Lucky’s editor in chief, Kim France, tartly told Ad Age she knows “not to expect a General Excellence award from ASME.”

Kim, whose last name is a product placement for the French
Tourism Bureau, obviously speaks with an attitude that is sponsored by
Sweet Tarts.