People-to-people solutions: Thanks to Jeff Jarvis for helping me learn more about the work of Spirit of America (You can learn more in Dan Gillmor’s Sunday column about it.} Frankly, as someone who reads a fair amount of history, especially early American history (a benefit from part of the day job), it is frustrating to witness the shrilly defeatist realtime coverage of the aftermath of the war in Iraq. Pick up any of the great books written in recent years about our nation’s founders (my current favorite is Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow) and it will strike you as miraculous that our nation survived the decades following our own Revolutionary War. The aftermath of any war is hell. It is chaos defined. Why those who analyze and report this war think it should be any different boggles me.

Yet rather than stew in my frustration, I have decided to join forces with Jeff and other supporters of Spirit of America…to at least do something positive about helping to the address the current chaos. First, I will be contributing (and encouraging others to join me) to the organization’s efforts to match the needs of everyday Iraqis with the generousity of everyday Americans. These are people-to-people, grassroots efforts. Spirit of America has already responded to many requests of in-country U.S. military forces and other U.S. personnel for humanitarian, educational and technological resources needed by Iraqi citizens surrounding them.

I hope you will join me in supporting Spirit of America and in letting others know about its (or better: ours, yours and mine) efforts.





Is Google bad for business (to business publishers)? A big chunk of Google’s revenue is business-to-business advertising dollars. What is the dramatic growth of such online advertising expenditures doing to traditional print-based business-to-business publishers? Frankly, no one knows the answers yet, but Pat Kenealy, CEO of IDG, is at least asking the questions…and suggesting other business-to-business publishers start asking the same. This may seem like an esoteric issue, but it is important for publishers to follow the nuances of this issue. As Pat leads one of the world’s largest business-to-business media companies, one that has always been an aggressive leader in putting its content on the web, free for all Internet users to access, it will be important to watch what IDG does if Google gains a larger and larger piece of the budget pie from traditional IDG advertisers. Would it be too far-fetched to imagine a day in which IDG and other business-to-business publishers who offer their content free to web users not allow Google to index their websites? If IDG cuts off their content from Google, would they be shooting themselves in the foot…or would they be making the only decision that makes sense? I know some people believe, “you don’t exist if you don’t allow Google to index you,” but the content produced daily by the hundreds of technology writers and analysts employeed by IDG will be found by those in the IT world who depend on it, Googled or not. I don’t know the answers, but this will be interesting to follow.





May 30th, 2004

Moon-writing: When Kate White isn’t doing editor-in-chief stuff at Cosmopolitan magazine, she writes bestselling murder mysteries in which the “spunky sleuth” is a crime writer for a Cosmo-like magazine. (via iwantmedia.com)





Give it to her, or give up: Martha Stewart will ask for community service, says Newsweek (via Bloomberg). If this weblog were the judge or prosecutor, this weblog would jump at the chance to settle in this way vs. the obvious overturning and exoneration she will get if they don’t accept.





May 28th, 2004

To blog or not to blog: This weblog will be somewhere today that may or may not have web access. So there may or may not be much weblogging on this weblog today.





P&G’s new custom magazine is yellow journalism: MediaDaily News’ Michael Shields reports that Procter & Gamble is testing in the U.K. a new magazine for mothers called Mustard. (Not to be confused with this Mustard Magazine.)

Quote:

We are always looking at developing new marketing tools to deepen the relationship with our consumers, and given the way that magazines engage with their readership, this is a communication channel that we are interested in testing,” said Judith Russell, a P&G spokesperson. While the company declined to say whether the magazine is part of a larger push into the consumer publishing business, Russell confirmed that there are currently no plans to launch this magazine in the United States. “We are taking one step at a time,” she said.

Mustard will be delivered to some consumers at home, with 1 million additional copies being distributed via the Saturday Express starting May 29th. Print media mavens at some non-P&G shops say they are intrigued by the move, and think it may be a smart move. “My instinct is, a lot of branded publications have been slightly slanted, but P&G stands for a lot of good things,” noted Steve Greenberger, senior vice president-director of print media at Zenith Media. “If it has usable information that helps make people’s lives better, I think it’s okay.”

Greenberger added that P&G’s considerable research strength in the United States might make the company particularly well-suited to launch a U.S.-targeted magazine. “The question is how overly blatant it is,” he said. “We have to wait and see what it looks like.” Since little is known about Mustard, at this point any judgment may be premature, and several agency executives declined to comment.

The new book may be no different than run-of-the-mill custom publishing, which has been a common practice by marketers for years. “This is nothing new,” said Mike McHale, senior vice president-group media director at Optimedia. “There are lots of brands that have custom magazines.” It’s also not unheard of for brands to attempt to launch “objective” magazines. After tobacco manufacturers began withdrawing ad dollars from many consumer magazines a few years ago to avoid targeting younger readers, Phillip Morris began to publish lifestyle magazine Unlimited in conjunction with Hachette Filipacchi. In addition to Phillip Morris brands, Unlimited has featured ads from major brands such as Altoids and Maxwell House.

Of course, P&G has been in the original content business for quite some time. The company is credited with inventing the soap opera back in the early days of radio and television. Procter & Gamble Productions, Inc. currently produces “Guiding Light,” and once produced longtime soap “Another World.”

I apologize for the long quote, but I needed to do so in order to commend Michael Shields for anticipating every nit-pick I would have made about his story had he not been so diligent in providing context for this news. Because of his stellar reporting, I will forgive his minor run-of-the-mill jab.





May 27th, 2004

Vaporzine weekly? In an adjective-rich story, Folio: reports that David Bradley, chairman and owner of Atlantic Media, is “actively researching the prospect of creating” a national weekly news magazine. (”Actively researching the prospect of creating.” Parse that. While I can’t determine exactly what the phrase means, I am actively considering the prospect of making it a part of the definition of the word vaporzine.) According to the article, Bradley apparently has actively researched the prospect enough to know that the new title won’t be associated with the company’s “venerable” flagship book, Atlantic Monthly, often referred to by the less-venerable-sounding name, The Atlantic. What a shame, however: Atlantic Weekly would have worked so well.

Sources have told Folio: that the “nascent” magazine may be based on the “well-respected” German magazine Der Spiegel, which this weblog finds puzzling as I doubt very many Americans can speak German, much less read it. I think Folio: has this story confused: More likely, Atlantic Media is considering the prospect of creating a weekly shopping magazine based on the venerable and well-respected Spiegel Catalog.

(via the venerable and well-respected Romensko.)





The young & the wordless: As reported on this weblog last December and predicted even earlier, Abercrombie & Fitch didn’t really “kill” A&F Quarterly, they merely renamed it “Young”, took out all the words and let Bruce Weber shoot in black and white rather than in color (or did they just use some outtakes of his late 80s work for Calvin Klein?).

You gotta love this quote:

“Unike the quarterly, ‘Young’ is a collection of black and white photographs of models wearing our brand clothes and there’s no editorial content in it at all,” (spokesman Tom) Lennox said. According to Lennox, the retailer quietly began distributing the publication in April to a limited list of its former quarterly subscribers.

There is no mention of Young on the Abercrombie site (unlike all the press releases about Colors on the Benetton site), but you can find samples of it on eBay.





May 27th, 2004

Hammock man update: To answer the flood of e-mails asking me (okay, the one e-mail asking me), I will not be blogging another meeting with the President tonight. While he is currently a few blocks away from rexblog headquarters and will soon attend a fund-raiser at the home of one of this weblog’s closest friends, a sentence from a story in today’s Tennessean will answer why I won’t be blogging this time around:

Bush will end the day with a fund-raiser at the Hillsboro Pike home of Cathy and Clay Jackson: $2,000 per person or couple at a reception, $10,000 to pose for photos and $25,000 for dinner.

Gee. I didn’t realize how valuable this was.





May 27th, 2004

What magazines do the candidates’ backers read? Proving once more that most research provides little insight, a recent study from a company I won’t embarass by naming, came up with this gem: the top five magazines read by the two major presidential candidates’ supporters:

Bush Supporters Kerry Supporters Undecided
Readers Digest People Readers Digest
People Readers Digest People
Time Time Womens Day
Womens Day Newsweek Cosmopolitan
Sports Illustrated Maxim Sports Illustrated

Maxim? Huh? Does this have anything to do with Jeff Jarvis’ Stern vote theory?

(via MediaPost’s “Center for Media Research” Research Brief)





May 27th, 2004
Reminder - Nashville to honor WW II veterans

Reminder - Nashville to honor WW II veterans: Don’t forget, if you’re in Middle-Tennessee, please spread the word about a very special event honoring World War II veterans this Saturday, May 29, at the National Guard Armory (near 100 Oaks) (more information here). World War II veterans in this area who are unable to travel to Washington D.C. this weekend for the dedication of the National World War II Memorial will still have a chance to be recognized and honored by their fellow citizens and family-members.





May 27th, 2004
Friendly disagreement

Friendly disagreement: Rexblog friend Buzzmachine thinks rexblog friend Micro Persuasion’s blog-only experiment is a bogus PR gimmick. It’s a good thing that rexblog friend Micro Persuasion is a PR guy and despite its bogosity, the gimmick is getting lots of, well, PR, so I guess everyone should be happy. For the record, this weblog agrees with its friend Buzzmachine as that weblog bought this weblog dinner recently.

(Later: This weblog has changed its opinion of Micro Persuasion’s bogus gimmick. It’s no longer a bogus gimmick. And really, this change has nothing to do with Micro Persuasion inviting this weblog to dinner [see comments].)

(Even Later: This weblog has decided to waffle more than a presidential candidate as the weblog BuzzMachine counter-comments with a “guilt-free” offer. However, I will say to both Micro Persuasion & BuzzMachine, I’m inviting you both to dinner so we can work this whole thing out…and I’m picking up the tab.)





May 27th, 2004
Compulsive?

Compulsive? For some reason, people are sending me e-mails with a link to this NY Times story (subscription blah, blah) about compulsive bloggers. Okay. You can stop sending them.





May 27th, 2004
When this guy talks, listen

When this guy talks, listen: When it comes to the whole blogging thing, this weblog considers the Washington Post’s Dan Froomkin perhaps the most “gets-it” in-the-trenches journalist employed by a print-dominated media company. (Okay. We’ll admit the fact that he’s responsible for providing this weblog with its 15 minutes of fame influences our opinion. However, it was not his reporting that impressed me most. It was the e-mail exchange we engaged in throughout the day as he continued to ask me questions and commented on how I was responding to my critics.) So, when Dan writes an article titled, “Ideas for Online Publications: Lessons From Blogs, Other Signposts,” we read it and encourage all our print-publication friends to do so.

Highlights (read it all):

Push the print newsroom even more

Reporters should routinely consider, when they hear someone’s voice or see them in action, how presenting such information can add value to their journalism.

Learn the lessons of blogs

Consider if you were starting a “newspaper” today. Wouldn’t you want to facilitate exchanges with readers? Wouldn’t you want to encourage your readers to find out more than what you can publish? Wouldn’t you want to make it easier for them to take action? Wouldn’t you want to define and create a community? Wouldn’t you want to make your readers feel important? Blog tools give you all that?– not to mention the ability to easily and quickly post something you just found out about. (What could be more journalistic?)

Concentrate on geography

The tools have finally matured for genuine online community building: Blogs, social networking, phone-cams, ample bandwidth and penetration, etc.
Newspapers should start appending metadata code reflecting geographic location (ideally, street address and/or longitude and latitude, but at the very least city and ZIP code) to absolutely everything.

Serve the audience

Our best, most important work should feature compelling narratives, visual story-telling, interaction with the authors and newsmakers, and Web tools that encourage and harness citizen action. Don’t just put a big serious thing out there in big fat text parts (with a few links and maybe a poorly captioned photo gallery) and expect to make a splash online. Finally, online news sites need to spend much more energy exploring traffic data. What are people actually coming for? What is compelling? What generates that extra click? What does trying this or tweaking that or rewriting these headlines actually do? We shouldn’t blindly chase traffic, but with most Web site managers just getting a few overall numbers and looking at macro-level trends, we don’t fundamentally understand how people are using our sites. Home page editors, for instance, should have real-time data in the background to inform their decisions.

Have more fun

Online news managers should encourage more risk-taking and more fun. Amazingly, newspaper Web sites often take themselves more seriously than newspapers, which we sometimes forget do so much more than just news. Of course we need to maintain our high ethical standards and be respectful of readers. But we shouldn’t be so damn serious?– especially in that all-important first screen of the home page. Newspapers have comics, and horoscopes, not to mention gossip columns and fluffy features. And the truth is, fun things click on the Web.

See what I mean. He gets it.

(Later: Jeff Jarvis agrees Dan is “instructive.”)

(Even later: Dan e-mailed this weblog to say, “Thanks, Hammock Man.”)





May 26th, 2004
Blurred logic

Blurred logic: In Thursday’s Christian Science Monitor, Clayton Collins re-hashes a worn-out clichŽ reports on “what some observers of the industry call a troubling trend: the peppering of magazine articles with product brand names.”

Collins blatantly ignores over 250 years of American magazine history by implying that something dating back to Benjamin Franklin is somehow new. But I will forgive him that oversight. What I don’t excuse him for is the implication in this piece that readers are idiots. Or, for that matter, that consumer products appearing in a consumer magazine is blurring some kind of line. Clayton, pick up a copy of Cargo if you want to see product placement on steroids (not to be confused with the placement of products of steroids). Pick up a copy of Southern Living and read about their idea homes if you want to see product placement as an art form. Using an article from Ski magazine that praises an SUV is not exactly investigative journalism. (Oh, did I mention that for authoritative insight, Collins quotes an analyst from the group that issued a study revealing how conservative NPR is? A group with the word “accuracy” in its name?)

Obviously, I’m also vexed by Collins lumping custom publishing in with the “product placement” non-story. Customer magazines are clearly labeled (i.e., “Christian Science”) with the sponsor and publisher of the magazine. There are no “hidden agendas,” that is, unless, the editor pretends that it is not a customer magazine.

(Please, let me stress that, as an observer of the publishing industry, I am not at all troubled with religious denominations peppering the brands of newspapers they own with denominational brand names. And I believe them when the Christian Science Monitor claims over and over that the newspaper is independent of the church that owns it. I don’t think that the half-dozen links to information about the church that can be found on their “about us” page blurs the line between advertising and articles. Granted, it may haze it, but it does not blur it.)