January 28th, 2006

Wiki tricki: Congressional staffers are editiing their bosses’ bios (sometimes rather aggressively, so), a check of IP addresses reveal. When will people realize that a click on the history of any Wikipedia page will reveal the IP addresses of the computers from which changes were made?

Two-word advice to Hill staffers: Internet cafe.

Better advice: Click on the “discussion link” of the entry and explain any changes you make and the reasons you are making them. If the reason is, “We don’t want people to know that,” then, sorry, it’s not going to work. However, if you’re trying to add to the accuracy of the entry or to provide some balance to the interpretation of a fact in the entry, you’ll be lauded as a good Wikipedian. Don’t be a spineless weasel and think you can censor the facts in your boss’s bio. But don’t be shy about entering the fray to present your argument for an entry’s accuracy.

Technorati Tags: ,





January 28th, 2006

What Jack Shafer said: (In his Slate.com Press Box column: Not Just Another Column About Blogging: What newspaper history says about newspaper future.):

“The newspaper guild (again, reporters, editors, publishers) can’t compete by adding a few blogs here, blogging up coverage over there, and setting up “comment” sections. If newspapers, magazines, and broadcasters don’t produce spectacular news coverage no blogger can match, they have no right to survive.”





Clicky Web Analytics