Perception vs. Reality


nashville
<p><strong>Perception vs. Reality:</strong> In a <a href=”http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060615/BUSINESS01/606150377/-1/RSS05″>Tennessean story</a> about why the readership of the bi-weekly magazine with the misnomer name, Country Weekly, has fallen to 450,000 from 700,000, comes the following stellar reporting:</p>
<blockquote><em><p>”Several factors appear to be changing the business environment to support a mass-audience print publication for country music fans. For starters, there’s the Internet. Chet Flippo, a longtime music journalist and the editorial director of CMT and CMT.com, said he’s seen traffic at the network’s Web site increase from about 150,000 hits per day several years ago to an average of about 2 million per day recently.</p>
<p>”And when there’s something like CMA happening, then you’re talking 10 million hits a day,” Flippo said, adding that a full 60 percent of those page views come from pictures alone. I don’t think country music fans these days are looking for something like Country Weekly that’s feature driven and comes out once every two weeks,” he said. “Everything’s old by the time they get it.”</p></blockquote></em>
<p><img src=”http://idisk.mac.com/rexhammock/Public/cmtalexa.jpg” alt=”” width=”389″ height=”225″ hspace=”5″ vspace=”0″ align=”left”>I hate to burst Chet Flippo’s bubble with a <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisking”>fisk</a> point to <a href=”<a href=”http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?&#38;compare_sites=&y=p&q=&size=medium&range=max&url=cmt.com/”>Alexa.com’s data regarding CMT.com</a>. I don’t question that CMT.com has “2 million” <i>somethings</I> a day, but the trend chart doesn’t reveal CMT.com being the breakaway, magazine-crushing factor that’s changing the business environment to support a mass-audience print publication.</p>
<p>For the record, as a whole (and as a sign of the coming apocalypse) the celebrity magazine category has been one of the most robust segments of the magazine industry for several years. “Comfort food,” my friend Samir Husni calls it. The category has been so successful, that there has been an explosion in new titles in it. While individual titles in the category have come and gone (killer competition does that), I think one would be hard-pressed to prove with statistics that the Internet is the reason one specific magazine title has lost readership during an era when the magazine’s category has grown.</p>
As I’ve repeatedly said here on the rexblog, I am not a fan of the whole celebrity magazine genre — nor, for that matter, am I fan of the pop-suburban crap with the misnomer name, country music. Don’t get me wrong, I’m a fan of Nashville music — just not the kind you’d read about in Country Weekly or hear on country music radio. Perhaps the reason the magazine has lost circulation is quite simple. My theory without ever reading a copy is this: It probably sucks.</p>
Perception vs. Reality