You could win $62.50 if you comment on this post

What you are reading here is a sponsored review. I’m getting paid $125 to post it. The pay-for-blog-posting service that is paying me $125 for this review is called ReviewMe and I just registered on their site to see what a posted review here on the rexblog is worth. Apparently, if you want to purchase a review from me, they will charge you $250. Then I get half, $125. Unlike the pay-per-post scheme I blasted a few weeks ago, ReviewMe requires me to disclose that the post is sponsored. They also pay a lot better than the concept I blasted and they aren’t trying to run from their concept by creating a .org that sounds like they are not creating a heinous form of splogging.

Oh, by the way, this is a review of ReviewMe.

Here’s my review: If I were going to do reviews like this, I think I’d stick with them. I like the transparency of the transaction. They ran the rexblog through some algorithm that led them to believe a review here is worth $250. That impressed me. Then they require me to say what I’m doing. That impressed me. Then they tell me they’ll split the $250 with me. That really impressed me.

But the thing that impressed me most was that Scott Karp of Publishing 2.0 reviewed it and said everything that I would about it. I figured by pointing his way and saying “what he said” I could save myself about $50 worth of hassle in actually thinking what to write since I decided long ago, there’s very little I can add to whatever Scott has to say on something.

Another good thing about ReviewMe is they don’t require blogs to post positive reviews (however, I feel certain that blogs that post negative reviews won’t pick up that many gigs, if you know what I mean — you purchase a reviewer by placing him or her in your shopping cart and I don’t think too many shopping carts will get filled with blogs that do negative reviews. Wait, did that sound cynical?).

Anyway, I’m so impressed with the share-and-share-alike model of ReviewMe, I’ve decided to go one step better. I’ll pay $62.50 to one lucky reader who reads this review — you don’t even have to like it, just read it. To be considered for payment, all you need to do is add a comment on this post answering the following question: “Should a blogger accept payment for a post made on his or her blog?” Please keep your comment brief or link to your own blog for the long version. On your comment, make sure you have a valid e-mail address (it won’t be displayed, but I’ll be able to reach you if you win the $62.50). One e-mail address will be selected at random on November 18. I will send you the $62.50 when ReviewMe sends me my $125, so I have no idea when you’ll get it. Happy commenting. (Void where prohibited — but I won’t tell anyone if you don’t.)

Update: As this post has picked up some momentum from Tailrank, Techmeme and some other meme trackers, I feel the need to provide a bit of context for those who’ve never been by here, so I’ve added links to two previous posts:

  • One more time, slowly — why pay-per-post schemes are cancer.
  • The real reason behind pay-per-post schemes
  • Also, please continue to add comments to this post. After this experiment is over, I will post a summary.

    Clarification: While I signed up for ReviewMe for this experiment, I don’t plan on doing any more pay-per-review posts. I prefer the approach to other schemes, but I would prefer an approach that is outside the edit well. Also, the use of the “shopping cart” metaphor when an advertiser selects bloggers to pay is too ironic for me.


    Technorati Tags: , ,