February 6th, 2007

I typically don’t use this blog to comment on news items as tragically bizarre and off-topic as an astronaut being arrested for attempted murder, but there’s just something haunting me about this news. I thought I had become numb to any shock presented by the strange parade of pop-culture weirdness we witness because we live in a celebrity-crazed post-modern society. However, I’m not ready for this. I’m not ready for an astronaut — an astronaut for god’s sakes — to become just another sleazy low-life. I was in elementary school in the 1960s and watched John Glenn blast off in black and white. I have been led to believe the (now obvious) mythology that potential astronauts are subjected to the most rigorous screening possible to determine whether they possess the mental and physical “right stuff” to travel into space. This news makes me think they’re outsourcing their psychological screening to the postal service. I’m sorry. That was an attempt at humor. Indeed, by midnight, Leno, Letterman, Stewart, Colbert, etc., will have worked this strange news over with dozens of jokes. However, there’s something about the way the astronaut looks over there in her mug shot that captures how this whole creepy matter makes me feel. My astronaut-hero-worship was of one of the last remnants of my nearly-depleted innocence. This is just too weird for me.

Technorati Tags:





What do you call this decree from Steve Jobs? A manifesto? An essay? An edict? A judgement? I call it a long-overdue Apple papal bull.

In a minimalist presentation of 1,877 words, lacking his typical flare for graphics, Steve Jobs issues an essay on the topic of the cumbersome and easily hacked protection record labels require on music sold through Apple’s iTunes Store. Titled simply, “Thoughts on music,” the document is a big-pulpit, big-club swing at the big-four record labels calling on them to stop requiring DRM on music sold online when the same music sold on CDs carries no such protection.

Quote:

“Why would the big four music companies agree to let Apple and others distribute their music without using DRM systems to protect it? The simplest answer is because DRMs haven’t worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy. Though the big four music companies require that all their music sold online be protected with DRMs, these same music companies continue to sell billions of CDs a year which contain completely unprotected music. That’s right! No DRM system was ever developed for the CD, so all the music distributed on CDs can be easily uploaded to the Internet, then (illegally) downloaded and played on any computer or player.”

Jobs then suggests that European governments and consumers are barking up the wrong Apple tree when they protest that Apple is the culprit in the music-protection debate. He invites everyone to point their protests at the record companies.

“Convincing them to license their music to Apple and others DRM-free will create a truly interoperable music marketplace. Apple will embrace this wholeheartedly.

I think this is a great statement, but it would have impressed me if he had issued it in 2003 when the iTunes store launched. Any time is better than never, but Jobs loses some of the moral high-ground when doing this in reaction to governmental regulatory threats. While some on the blogosphere are ready to saint him, let’s pause: this is merely a logical business decision on Apple’s part. That aside, no DRM is a good thing.

Next suggestion: Drop DRM on those videos you sell on iTunes.

Observation: It’s odd Apple has no “blog-like” platform to issue such statements. Hey, but when you’re Steve Jobs, issuing some “thoughts” is enough, I guess.

Observation II: Mark Cuban is a better writer than Steve Jobs’ ghost on this.

Technorati Tags: , , ,





February 6th, 2007