<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New policy: Credentials of Wikipedia contributors must be verified if they want to win argument by playing the &#8216;Oh, yea, I went to Harvard&#8217; card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.RexBlog.com/2007/03/08/16641/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2007/03/08/16641?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-policy-credentials-of-wikipedia-contributors-must-be-verified-if-they-want-to-win-argument-by-playing-the-oh-yea-i-went-to-harvard-card</link>
	<description>Rex Hammock&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Esquire</title>
		<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2007/03/08/16641/comment-page-1#comment-13816</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Esquire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 18:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexblog.com/2007/03/08/16641/#comment-13816</guid>
		<description>Superficially, the Essjay case was about falsified credentials; at its core, it was about an elaborate deception that Essjay rationalized as being necessary because he held positions of trust at Wikipedia.  As I stated in a recent blog post - http://blog.xodp.org/2007/03/jimbo-wales-feeds-wikipedians-and.html - verifying credentials will not address the core issue of deception by Wikipedia administrators.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superficially, the Essjay case was about falsified credentials; at its core, it was about an elaborate deception that Essjay rationalized as being necessary because he held positions of trust at Wikipedia.  As I stated in a recent blog post &#8211; <a href="http://blog.xodp.org/2007/03/jimbo-wales-feeds-wikipedians-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.xodp.org/2007/03/jimbo-wales-feeds-wikipedians-and.html</a> &#8211; verifying credentials will not address the core issue of deception by Wikipedia administrators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nashville is Talking &#187; Dots and Dashes</title>
		<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2007/03/08/16641/comment-page-1#comment-13531</link>
		<dc:creator>Nashville is Talking &#187; Dots and Dashes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rexblog.com/2007/03/08/16641/#comment-13531</guid>
		<description>[...] New policy: Credentials of Wikipedia contributors must be verified if they want to win argument by playing the â€˜Oh, yea, I went to Harvardâ€™ card [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New policy: Credentials of Wikipedia contributors must be verified if they want to win argument by playing the â€˜Oh, yea, I went to Harvardâ€™ card [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 266/267 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d1u2mm1akgvrzl.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.rexblog.com @ 2012-02-10 14:46:45 -->
