One of the worst things I believe to ever to happen to blogging, Pay-Per-Post, has created a beach-head application on Facebook. My complaint with pay-per-post schemes (and not just the company of that name) is not with bloggers having advertising — or even with the notion of having sponsored posts — it’s with the way in which they had to be shamed into requiring their participating bloggers to disclose that posts are “paid.” If their strategy is to soon start paying people to post paid messages on notes and on walls, they will run into a brick wall. Unlike a blog, on Facebook, everyone is both a reader and writer. For most users, it will always be more of an identity platform than a publishing platform. If you want to know “How to monetize your Facebook account,” my advice is this: don’t ever accept money for putting anything on it — and, indeed, the day they offer a “pro” version that will allow you to suppress the ads they serve up on it, pay for it. If you do something so uncool as post paid messages on your profile, your “social graph” will head downward as people start to un-friend you. In fact, if I see anyone with a PayPerPost application on their account, it will be enough for me to block them.
Later: In response to some pay per post fans who are letting me know they disagree with what they think I’ve written rather than what I’ve actually written, in this post, here’s a little more explanation.
I have been fairly explicit in explaining my attitude towards pay-per-post ads. I believe if someone is transparent and says, I was paid to make this post, I believe they have raised above a minimum ethical standard…so I DID NOT SAY I will “unfriend” anyone who has a pay-per-post account or who has sponsored posts. That is not the issue I am talking about today. What I did say is this: I will block anyone on Facebook who “jestures” to me their Facebook identity is for sale. Adding the payperpost application is clearly such a jesture to me. I don’t want my mini-feed filled with ‘notes’ and ’shared links’ that are being posted by someone who is being paid to do so…and while I don’t think that may be a part of the pay-per-post model yet, adding such an application is clearly a move into that direction.
As for why a Facebook account is different than a blog, let me try to explain this in a simple way: While I view this blog as my identity, I know that many people view their blogs as “a publishing platform” on which they write — a content-management-platform with a goofy name, as one of my friends calls it. To them, a blog is a platform on which they “publish.” That’s fine and I applaud that and in those cases, advertising or sponsorship or any ethical business behavior is fine. Geez, if I were a NASCAR racer, I’d feel fine about having logos all over my car and clothing.
However, if I were a NASCAR driver, I wouldn’t want logos painted all over my house in the suburbs or tatoo’d on my children’s foreheads. Someone’s blog can be their race car — or their uniform. However, if you turn your Facebook identity into the same deal, well, you can expect some folks to tune out. I’m one of those folks.
Later.2: Robert Scoble says he doesn’t want to Amway his friends. Great analogy.





July 22nd, 2007 at 9:44 am
America, the land of opportunity.
July 22nd, 2007 at 10:49 am
Interesting post Rex. I’ve added the PPP application so you might want to block me, but I’d like to listen/understand your perspective over time…
July 22nd, 2007 at 4:29 pm
[...] the record: I will not “Amway” my Facebook friends Like Rex Hammock, I too decided not to add the new PayPerPostApplication. Why not? Because I don’t want to “Amway” or “Tupperware” my friends. I once was part of Amway for a couple of weeks and got out when I realized theway I’d fit into that group would be to constantly bug my friends if they’ve bought any Amway or Tupperware stuff. That isn’t how I want to be treated by myand it’s not how I’ll treat you. Good post Rex. Filed under: Facebook @ 2:54 pm# [...]
July 22nd, 2007 at 9:40 pm
[...] As such, I respectfully disagree with Rex Hammock’s point that adding a Facebook application immediately makes you worthy of a ban. If he is speaking strictly of his distaste of advertorials polluting his feed, then more power to him. If his comments are instead a slight against the very idea of Facebook application (which I don’t believe they are), then I would ask him to look at it from a wider perspective. Sphere: Related Content del.icio.us Digg it Furl Netscape RawSugar reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo MyWeb [...]
July 23rd, 2007 at 4:08 am
[...] Some people already aren’t happy about it, but then, that doesn’t often take much. Mashable muses, what if it gets a stranglehold of your newsfeed. Yuck. [...]