|
|
|
|
July 22nd, 2008
July 22nd, 2008
One might think I’d be all gung-ho about Esquire experimenting with a digital cover using the eInk technology that powers eBook readers like the Kindle. Sorry to disappoint you: I think it is nothing more than a goofy gimmick. In much the same way I believe it is folly to under-utilize new media by attempting to make it replicate old media, I think it is an even greater folly when old-media people think what’s special about new media is the way it blinks. It’s like when parents think they can better communicate with their kids by resorting to teenage slang. Or, worse, friending them on FaceBook. The result is nothing but embarrassment to all involved. Rather than displaying how ridiculous it is to suggest “this is the future of paper,” Esquire editors should be displaying how traditional, un-interactive, un-digital, un-batteried, un-gimmicked magazines are a wonderful medium. Esquire used to know that. Esquire used to celebrate that. Esquire used to be a monument to how great the magazine medium can be. Its editors and publishers should be embarrassed with the notion that the “21st Century starts” because they place some flashing, spam-like message on the cover. They should spend their money on great photography and great writing. That’s what makes great magazines. That’s what used to make Esquire great. Gimmicks don’t.
July 22nd, 2008
Ten years ago, Fortune Magazine sent a reporter to Nashville in search of how middle-America was being changed by the Internet. Writer Eryn Brown spent three weeks here working on the story — and did what I thought was a great job capturing those early, innocent days of World Wide Webness. Back then, only 12% of Nashville’s population was online (compared with around 26% in San Francisco at the time) but we were one of the first 20 markets to have cable-based Net access. Reba McEntire told Brown how her company’s Music Row studio had, “ISDN lines, fiber-optic lines, ‘the kit and kaboodle…We do teleconferencing, satellite feeds all over the world.’ McEntire can even do real-time remote recording, singing over ISDN lines while her session musicians and producer are in the Starstruck Studios back in Nashville.” In other words, it was a lifetime ago — but not that long ago, at all — especially if you change the initials ISDN to DSL. I had a small role in Eryn’s article:
Geez. That was ten years ago. And I was already getting the “even though he’s an old guy” caveat. And I was already complaining about no one doing anything about the weather — or, at least, the way the Internet can be used after a weather catastrophe. Fortunately, the use of the Internet after a disaster has begun to change, but re-reading that story, I’m convinced there’s little new thinking that was not at least roughed-out a decade ago. Things are smaller (with more capacity), faster, hipper, cooler — but most of the technology we are using today was around in the 1980s — it was just clunkier and slower. As far as Nashville goes, while I’m not sure Mr. Wallace has increased his usage of the Internet, the son he mentioned is definitely a member of the Nashville geekorati — as I was communicating with him yesterday afternoon via e-mail he was reading on his phone. I was asking him if his dad was out of kindergarten. On the business end of things, there have been some genuine success stories among Web-based startups in Nashville. And plenty of setbacks, er, lessons along the way. Last week, Jackson Millier, a Nashville friend I met through the blogosphere, wrote about what he’s seeing in Nashville these days:
While I’m not so sure Nashville will ever be recognized as a national tech hub, I do know it’s a great place to live, raise a family and grow a business — geek or not. Time posted: 7:06 am |
permalink | categories: Nashville, blogging & bloggers, technology |
2 comments »
July 22nd, 2008
|