Comments on: The AP is doing what? http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/04/06/19303?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-ap-is-doing-what Rex Hammock's Blog Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:37:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Hudge http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/04/06/19303/comment-page-1#comment-331102 Hudge Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:51:19 +0000 http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/04/06/19303#comment-331102 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bbd53bd17a5713678ea8bea533d92910.2a01&show_article=1 http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.bbd53bd17a5713678ea8bea533d92910.2a01&show_article=1

]]> By: Rex Hammock http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/04/06/19303/comment-page-1#comment-330861 Rex Hammock Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:31:53 +0000 http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/04/06/19303#comment-330861 @Ian. Perhaps you are correct. But I still don't understand how that can be characterized by the New York Times as "taking aim" at Google, Yahoo! et al. Do you think AP is thinking they can provide Google a list of sites it shouldn't index? I can think of others who would like to provide other such lists to Google because they don't approve of the content on those sites. Perhaps we need a Constitutional amendment to protect the Freedom of Search. @Ian. Perhaps you are correct. But I still don’t understand how that can be characterized by the New York Times as “taking aim” at Google, Yahoo! et al. Do you think AP is thinking they can provide Google a list of sites it shouldn’t index? I can think of others who would like to provide other such lists to Google because they don’t approve of the content on those sites. Perhaps we need a Constitutional amendment to protect the Freedom of Search.

]]> By: Ian Kennedy http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/04/06/19303/comment-page-1#comment-330857 Ian Kennedy Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:02:58 +0000 http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/04/06/19303#comment-330857 Hi Rex, It sounds like they are trying to sculpt the traffic so that the sites that get crawled by search engines (and thus benefit from the traffic) are the ones that have paid for the license to redistribute on the web. Hi Rex,

It sounds like they are trying to sculpt the traffic so that the sites that get crawled by search engines (and thus benefit from the traffic) are the ones that have paid for the license to redistribute on the web.

]]>