<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thought&#8217;s on Twitter #6: Why I&#8217;m re-booting my Twitter follow list</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=thoughts-on-twitter-6-why-im-re-booting-my-twitter-follow-list</link>
	<description>Rex Hammock&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Seitz</title>
		<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830/comment-page-1#comment-342922</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Seitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830#comment-342922</guid>
		<description>That research you&#039;re looking for on 150 people is the Dunbar Number.

http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/DunbarNumber</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That research you&#8217;re looking for on 150 people is the Dunbar Number.</p>
<p><a href="http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/DunbarNumber" rel="nofollow">http://webseitz.fluxent.com/wiki/DunbarNumber</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yaniel Cantelar</title>
		<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830/comment-page-1#comment-342919</link>
		<dc:creator>Yaniel Cantelar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830#comment-342919</guid>
		<description>@Aaron, Dunbar Number is what you&#039;re looking for when talking about the relationships a person can maintain successfully.

@Rex I&#039;ve had to reboot my list a few times because after following a certain amount of people, it becomes a chore to keep up with the feed so i have to streamline it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aaron, Dunbar Number is what you&#8217;re looking for when talking about the relationships a person can maintain successfully.</p>
<p>@Rex I&#8217;ve had to reboot my list a few times because after following a certain amount of people, it becomes a chore to keep up with the feed so i have to streamline it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Hammock</title>
		<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830/comment-page-1#comment-342917</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Hammock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830#comment-342917</guid>
		<description>@Aaron - Thanks for reminding me. I meant to mention the &quot;set up another account as a follow-only one&quot; -- For a project we&#039;re working on at Hammock, we&#039;ve done just that. The RSS feed from it is powering content for an event-related site feature. As I&#039;m building back my list, I&#039;ve already thought that my personal follow list is probably going to be less a currated list for others and more a currated list for me. However, I may build back some of those category lists of &quot;my&quot; Suggested User List. Although I&#039;d like another platform than Twitter to do that. Maybe someone could create a White Label &quot;WeFollow.com&quot; for me. Anybody? Anybody?

Second: My Kindle related following list is you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Aaron &#8211; Thanks for reminding me. I meant to mention the &#8220;set up another account as a follow-only one&#8221; &#8212; For a project we&#8217;re working on at Hammock, we&#8217;ve done just that. The RSS feed from it is powering content for an event-related site feature. As I&#8217;m building back my list, I&#8217;ve already thought that my personal follow list is probably going to be less a currated list for others and more a currated list for me. However, I may build back some of those category lists of &#8220;my&#8221; Suggested User List. Although I&#8217;d like another platform than Twitter to do that. Maybe someone could create a White Label &#8220;WeFollow.com&#8221; for me. Anybody? Anybody?</p>
<p>Second: My Kindle related following list is you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Pressman</title>
		<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830/comment-page-1#comment-342915</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Pressman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830#comment-342915</guid>
		<description>Great post. A couple of thoughts.

1. I have tried to limit my twitter following list (and Facebook friends, and MyBlogLog friends and so on) in part based on the theory about social networks (the real-life kind) that says an average person can only really interact with about 150 to 175 other individuals at a time. Of course, now I can&#039;t find a citation for that research.

2. I know it would super-geeky and perhaps insanely complex, but did you give any thought to opening a couple of Twitter accounts, segregating different categories of followers among them and then using a program like Tweetdeck to monitor them simultaneously. I ask because if Jay&#039;s notion about curated lists is correct, you might be burying your otherwise valuable selections by mixing them together. 

3. Following that thought, I&#039;ve decided that now the race is on. I&#039;m going to post about the best people to follow on Twitter who write about the future of media/journalism and another on ebooks and the Kindle. Kind of a my list&#039;s bigger than yours thing :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. A couple of thoughts.</p>
<p>1. I have tried to limit my twitter following list (and Facebook friends, and MyBlogLog friends and so on) in part based on the theory about social networks (the real-life kind) that says an average person can only really interact with about 150 to 175 other individuals at a time. Of course, now I can&#8217;t find a citation for that research.</p>
<p>2. I know it would super-geeky and perhaps insanely complex, but did you give any thought to opening a couple of Twitter accounts, segregating different categories of followers among them and then using a program like Tweetdeck to monitor them simultaneously. I ask because if Jay&#8217;s notion about curated lists is correct, you might be burying your otherwise valuable selections by mixing them together. </p>
<p>3. Following that thought, I&#8217;ve decided that now the race is on. I&#8217;m going to post about the best people to follow on Twitter who write about the future of media/journalism and another on ebooks and the Kindle. Kind of a my list&#8217;s bigger than yours thing <img src='http://d1u2mm1akgvrzl.cloudfront.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Thursday, 06-Aug-09 12:18:17 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830/comment-page-1#comment-342913</link>
		<dc:creator>Friends of Dave (friendsofdave) 's status on Thursday, 06-Aug-09 12:18:17 UTC - Identi.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 12:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830#comment-342913</guid>
		<description>[...]  http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830" rel="nofollow">http://www.RexBlog.com/2009/08/06/19830</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/8 queries in 0.388 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 315/316 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d1u2mm1akgvrzl.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.rexblog.com @ 2012-02-10 14:58:12 -->
